Thoughtful piece on where AI falls short. The distinction between pattern recognition and genuine judgment is spot-on, though I'd argue the line gets blurrier than we expect. Back in my consulting days,I watched people defer to algorithms for decisions that seemed purely quantitative, only to discover later they'd outsourced something fundamentally human. The real risk isnt AI replacing judgment, its us forgetting to use ours.
Thanks for contributing to this debate! I believe that, in the face of AI’s exponential changes, there will always be human judgment to help us evolve as a species (globally). Even if, for certain actions, we stop using our minds the way we used to. It reminds me a bit of how calculators became widespread. Who does mental arithmetic now? Far fewer people than years ago. Yet we still keep advancing in science and mathematics every year.
Thoughtful piece on where AI falls short. The distinction between pattern recognition and genuine judgment is spot-on, though I'd argue the line gets blurrier than we expect. Back in my consulting days,I watched people defer to algorithms for decisions that seemed purely quantitative, only to discover later they'd outsourced something fundamentally human. The real risk isnt AI replacing judgment, its us forgetting to use ours.
Thanks for contributing to this debate! I believe that, in the face of AI’s exponential changes, there will always be human judgment to help us evolve as a species (globally). Even if, for certain actions, we stop using our minds the way we used to. It reminds me a bit of how calculators became widespread. Who does mental arithmetic now? Far fewer people than years ago. Yet we still keep advancing in science and mathematics every year.