Imagine you need to solve a complex and urgent challenge. And you have a lifeline: Would you rely on the answer of just one person or harness the collective power of the entire group? I can already guess your answer.
However, if we apply this same challenge to your organization, what happens? Do a few people make the decisions? Or do multiple teams collaborate and contribute to solving the challenges?
If decision-making in your organization is top-down, let me share something with you: the hierarchical decision-making model is a system destined to fail. And it’s easy to understand why: The fewer people involved in making a decision, the narrower the perspective on the challenge.
With more distributed leadership, you can leverage the perspectives of more people in decision-making and, by sharing authority, create a work environment with better ideas, higher motivation, and improved results.
Now, I understand it can be challenging to involve many people in decision-making. It might even seem counterproductive. But I’m not suggesting that everyone decides on everything. I’m advocating for involving those who understand, recognize, or experience the specific challenge in the decision-making process.
If you want to promote distributed leadership:
Encourage open dialogue and the exchange of information.
Ask questions instead of dictating answers.
Involve the team from the beginning to build trust and commitment.
The key is to listen, involve, and trust.